A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning potential neighbours around the development of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national interest subsequent an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed loved ones house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments article about René Collier plus the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as an area disagreement has developed right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development is effective at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a corporation director respectively, find to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up inhabitants. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting manufactured by their potential neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that become emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to comprehend the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement more than boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to develop a family property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed according to Specialist advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical fact of your coastline and the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless Irish Times article about René Collier of whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how swiftly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.